3 ms·
Not saying "not true for all values of x", I'm claiming "not worth reading for all values of x", because it's way too soon to make predictions about what will s
by rossdavidh 6y ago
Not saying "not true for all values of x", I'm claiming "not worth reading for all values of x", because it's way too soon to make predictions about what will stick and what won't. I could imagine that _something_ will stick, I just don't think the Economist or anyone else is going to be any good at predicting what.
- Jedd 6y agoI guess TFA doesn't think there's a constraint on how soon they can offer up some predictions based on google search words. > I just don't think the Economist or anyone else is going to be any good at predicting what. So your early prediction is that their early predictions are going to be wrong? ; )
- rossdavidh 6y agoHa! Yes, although technically I'm just saying "frequently wrong", for example maybe half of them, and thus not worth reading.