A solution for that is for judges to award costs based on the merits of the case and ability of each party to to pay. Tricky case where both sides have a legit

A solution for that is for judges to award costs based on the merits of the case and ability of each party to to pay. Tricky case where both sides have a legitimate reason to believe they are in the right - no costs awarded. Borderline barratry - full costs awarded. One FAANG sues another - full costs awarded to the winner. Owner of a small corner shop wins against a FAANG - full costs. Other way round, no costs. Also to set appropriate levels on what costs can be awarded (kinda like the German model). You want to spend 10M on suing a street market stallholder? Knock yourself out, costs awarded = 10k.