I would think that it would violate Due Process if PACER or any other public court record was needed for a case, but the person needing them could not afford th

I would think that it would violate Due Process if PACER or any other public court record was needed for a case, but the person needing them could not afford them... On a related note, I would think that it would violate Due Process if any piece of information relevant to any case, legal or otherwise, were available and not provided, that is, if there was some sort of barrier (monetary, legal, or otherwise) preventing its easy and complete acquisition by the public, or whoever was involved in a case and needed it...