3 ms·
Summary: They are letting the state set the rule instead. Important quote: They acknowledge that the hunting rule change may not threaten Alaska’s overall pop
by ars 6y ago
Summary: They are letting the state set the rule instead.
Important quote:
They acknowledge that the hunting rule change may not threaten Alaska’s overall populations of bears and wolves, but they express concern that it undermines the National Park Service’s mission to preserve and protect nature—not just in Alaska, but possibly throughout the U.S.
“This [rule] sets a dangerous precedent,” Ripple says. “It has implications for the potential exploitation of wildlife in federal protected areas of the lower 48 states.”
- erulabs 6y agoIt sets a precedent for sure - but I can’t help but doubt when someone says “if anyone else is in charge - it will be disaster!” Are conservationists only involved at the federal level? My own experience in CA is at least the opposite...