2 ms·
https://blog.plan99.net/pseudo-epidemics-7603b2da839 https://blog.plan99.net/pseudo-epidemics-7603b2da839 ...
by chx 6y ago
https://blog.plan99.net/pseudo-epidemics-7603b2da839 https://blog.plan99.net/pseudo-epidemics-7603b2da839 ...
- systemsdude 6y agoThe false positive test was for antigens. Tests like that are known to be less accurate: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/05/coronavirus-antigen-tests-quick-and-cheap-too-often-wrong https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/05/coronavirus-antigen-... The two negatives were PCR tests. Those are different from antigen tests. The blog post you've linked says there is a problem with false positives with PCR tests, but that doesn't seem to be relevant here, given that both of those results are negative.