Is there really a plausible world in which Apple, the world's most valuable company and one of it's most recognizable brands, might be determined by a court to

Is there really a plausible world in which Apple, the world's most valuable company and one of it's most recognizable brands, might be determined by a court to have neglected to affirmatively defend its ubiquitous trademarks merely by failing to persecute a tiny company with a significantly different but also fruit-themed brand?