4 ms·
I'm open to constructive criticism and comments. What would you change to improve it? What made it bad?
by qumqats 6y ago
I'm open to constructive criticism and comments.
What would you change to improve it? What made it bad?
- bblough 6y agoI'm not the person you're replying to, but I'll offer my 2 cents. Frankly, there is a TON of info present, and as someone who hasn't yet attended an on-site DEFCon (though I hope to someday), it's a bit overwhelming. I certainly understand the appeal of a plain text format, but personally, I think it would be a big improvement to have a schedule grid (think TV guide or similar) with the village on one axis and the time slot on the other. I think this would make skimming over the schedule a lot easier overall, as well as making it easier to focus on a particular village or time slot, while still being able to relate/compare it to the others. I also think this is especially helpful since the talks vary in size and can overlap with each other, so having a visual representation would IMO make it a lot easier to see at-a-glance what the conflicts are. Of course, this could just be my personal preference, as this is what is used by several of other conferences I have attended or do regularly attend. I'm certainly no UI expert.
- fulafel 6y agoThe srt files add noise. There could be topic tags or some otjer structure.