5 ms·
Exactly what I had in mind. The article does not mention cow milk's health implications, and only focuses on debunking Oatly's alleged health benefits. This cr
by puttycat 6y ago
Exactly what I had in mind.
The article does not mention cow milk's health implications, and only focuses on debunking Oatly's alleged health benefits. This creates the same "Obscure the Truth" effect the article opens with, giving the impression that there's nothing wrong with cow milk.
If both options are equally unhealthy (which is at the minimum the biased impression the article gives by not discussing cow milk), at the minimum the moral one should be chosen.
- gvjddbnvdrbv 6y agoWhat actual proven health implications does cows milk have?
- crispyporkbites 6y agoMost people have some level of lactose malabsorption. Also cows milk has pretty grave health implications for the cows
- m3kw9 6y agoSo does eating meat.
- flyinglizard 6y agoI asked my vegan friends if they’d rather these animals would not exist at all rather than be used for milk production (because they are only bred into existence for that). I wonder how that logic applies to humans born into living in rough countries, would vegans rather they would not exist at all? It’s not like a dairy cow has a life of eternal suffering after all. It eats, grazes, rests and socializes. It does cow things.
- schmidt87 6y agoI suggest you look up "factory farming" before making claims like "It’s not like a dairy cow has a life of eternal suffering after all". They literally don't do any of the activities you mention.
- flyinglizard 6y agoI know dairy farming very, very well. It varies between areas. In France for example, there are no mega farms, all farms are small to medium, many family owned. Hormones are banned. This is true for other parts of Western Europe. Mega Farms are mostly an American issue. I do not support them at all.
- schmidt87 6y agoThis is substantially incorrect, especially for France [1]: While cows indeed aren't grown in intensive farming in France, 95% of pork in France is raised in intensive factory farming, and other species have similar stats. Most of the western world has similar stats. This is far from a US-only problem. [1] https://www.liberation.fr/france/2018/06/04/porcs-bovins-volailles-la-vraie-vie-de-la-viande-francaise-dans-l-elevage-intensif_1656528 https://www.liberation.fr/france/2018/06/04/porcs-bovins-vol...
- flyinglizard 6y agoI was specifically talking about dairy farming. Pork, chicken and beef all have their own issues. The average USA farm size is about 220 cows vs. about 70 cows in France, and the practices used in Europe as a whole are more humane (my numbers are from closed market studies published by IFCN). These animals are very well monitored and cared for. I wouldn't want to change place with them, but then I also wouldn't trade places with many other humans around the world.
- schmidt87 6y agoI agree that cows are better off in France, but this is an anomaly.
- kwhitefoot 6y agoThey are to some extent better off in Norway too, although their lot should still be improved.
- nnp7000 6y agoDairy cows exist because we actively breed them. We inject dairy cows with sperm to keep them pregnant so they keep producing milk, then take their calf away and repeat the process. They're not multiplying on their own.
- flyinglizard 6y agoThat’s exactly my point. With no utility, these animals would not exist. Are their lives so miserable that we can morally assert that they should not be living?
- schmidt87 6y agoYes, they are extremely miserable (look up "factory farming").
- dsabanin 6y agoIt’s like saying: these are my children, without me they wouldn’t exist, I can subject them to anything and they should be happy that they have existence. I would argue that no existence is better than existence filled with endless misery, agony and pain. Factory farms are a disgrace to humanity. It is my opinion that until we develop enough compassion to see this and stop, humans have no hope of creating lasting peace amongst each other. Our morality has a deadly wound at its core, and it’s rotting away at our souls.
- crispyporkbites 6y agoI mean you could extend this argument to anything, should we all be procreating all day every day to ensure every possible life is lived? Should dogs be forced to have 10s of litters? Should we encourage insects? The answer to all of these is obviously no. So why do you make the case for cows?
- NotGargarin 6y agoI'd recommend some more research into the how cows in dairy farms are treated. Your description is rather more idyllic than the reality, I think. For one, most male calves are not needed on a dairy farm, so they are either slaughtered for veal, raised as beef cattle, or euthanized at birth [1]. Whether this matter to you depends on where you stand on vegetarianism of course, and anyway the issues with the wellfare of meat herds is not what I wanted to discuss. The dairy cows are also not quite so happy, I think. Mastitis is a potentially fatal disease of the udder, usually caused by bacteria entering the teat; many of the practices on a dairy farm make this far more likely, and while of course the farmers are doing all they can to stop it, it is still one of the biggest issues in the industry, and it seems that some level of mastitis is expected in all dairy herds [2]. It is perhaps a side note to the animal wellfare aspect, but the use of antibiotics is a big part of the mitigations, and seems to be administered as a matter of course; this is an issue because it promotes antibiotic resistance in bacteria, which has implications for humans too. There are other wellfare issues around overwork of cows from producing much larger amounts of milk than they would to feed a calf, whether grains are a healthy food compared to grasses, and even mental health issues such as separating cows from their calves and whether they have enough access to the outdoors. I've tried to select links that are balanced and non-hyperbolic, but it's tricky to do. Like I said, I recommend more research but try not to be too turned off the hyperbolic articles on both sides. Articles from vegans are often under-researched and manipulative, but if you dig around you'll find that many of the issues they discuss are real. On the other hand, farmers are of course not animal hating devils and so write to defend themselves and their livelihood, but they can often go the other way and underplay the issues that are there. And finally, animal wellfare is not the only argument for veganism, because livestock has an environmental impact comparable to the transport industry [3]. [1] https://www.dairy.com.au/dairy-matters/you-ask-we-answer/what-happens-to-male-calves https://www.dairy.com.au/dairy-matters/you-ask-we-answer/wha... [2] https://www.pubs.ext.vt.edu/404/404-233/404-233.html https://www.pubs.ext.vt.edu/404/404-233/404-233.html [3] https://news.trust.org/item/20180918083629-d2wf0 https://news.trust.org/item/20180918083629-d2wf0
- hhjinks 6y agoGlobally, yeah, but not in the areas where people actually drink milk. Being able to digest cow milk is basically a regional mutation.
- dsabanin 6y agoI also imagine drinking diluted cows pregnancy and chronic inflammation hormones with extra cortisol on top from all the stress they experience because of their living conditions can’t be beneficial for you as well.
- istjohn 6y agoTFA links to this article which discusses the health pros and cons of cows milk: https://www.healthline.com/health/is-milk-bad-for-you https://www.healthline.com/health/is-milk-bad-for-you
- gvjddbnvdrbv 6y agoSo unless you are allergic/intolerant or drink a vast amount there are no proven health risks. Indeed it is a healthy food.
- saithound 6y ago> The article does not mention cow milk's health implications, and only focuses on debunking Oatly's alleged health benefits The article links to an entire other article discussing cow milk's health implications. > If both options are equally unhealthy (which is at the minimum the biased impression the article gives by not discussing cow milk), at the minimum the moral one should be chosen. Cow's milk and oat milk aren't the only two alternatives, though. Milk substitutes abound, some of them having much better health and moral implications (and as discussed in this thread, milk substitutes can be made at home).
- muglug 6y agoYeah, and one shouldn't ignore the economic and environmental drawbacks of milk – in the US, at least, the government subsidises milk production heavily so it's profitable for the farmers. And dairy milk is terrible for the environment: https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46654042 https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-46654042
- Spooky23 6y agoThat’s a bunk argument. The HFCS in every milk substitute that sells is the ultimate subsidy crop. Soy and rice are as well. Dairy isn’t profitable for farmers and is rapidly declining as beverage giants and more politically powerful agriculture interests push their policy goals. The environmental arguments aren’t very convincing to me. I grew up in an agricultural area where dairy was king and there was a diversified crop economy. Now it’s corn+fertilizer. Carbon impact may be lower, but the impact on the environment is more than carbon. Water depletion in the Midwest, pollution from runoff and over utilization and other factors matter too.
- kritiko 6y agoThere’s no HFCS in Oatly. I don’t really see how water depletion is a relevant issue when most cows are being fed grain and soy. Vegans probably ignore the harms of monoculture in their arguments. But a lot of meat eaters like to point to studies of how cattle and sheep can graze on land that can’t support other agriculture. Sure, but what % of cattle are actually raised that way? How much does a burger or gallon of milk cost when it’s grass fed.