> She has a manager who (apparently) has a low tolerance for risk. He probably got to where he is by spinning situations so that it's not his fault. We're talk

> She has a manager who (apparently) has a low tolerance for risk. He probably got to where he is by spinning situations so that it's not his fault. We're talking about Matt Cutts here who took what was likely a massive pay cut to work for the government after a long career at Google. Neither does this inference seem credible, nor does the characterization of him as "idiot manager" in the article https://www.google.com/amp/s/searchengineland.com/matt-cutts-officially-resigns-google-267801/amp https://www.google.com/amp/s/searchengineland.com/matt-cutts... https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Cutts https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Cutts