I didn't say "it's the same thing", I said "As something that is likely to do good and isn't much of a sacrifice, it's the same thing" > I would obviously obje

I didn't say "it's the same thing", I said "As something that is likely to do good and isn't much of a sacrifice, it's the same thing" > I would obviously object to other people forcing me into adopting any unreasonable habit. There is nothing "unreasonable" about naming 3 things you are grateful for each day. If you did it each day, you could probably get it down to taking a few seconds. > Or do you mean the general attitude by commentators (in the media/on twitter etc.) towards people not abiding by those laws? I do mean the attitude, but not about not abiding to laws per se. It's just a wholesale dismissal. Like, what does "mentally stable" have to do with anything, why did you weave that in there? Because instable people are complaining about masks or think G5 causes Corona? What do, for example, arguments put forward in the OP article have to do with that?