7 ms·
I don't get that at all. Woz vs Jobs is not an apt analogy at all. Jobs was never risk averse. He saw what could be done and how to make money off of it. Apple
by IOT_Apprentice 6y ago
I don't get that at all. Woz vs Jobs is not an apt analogy at all. Jobs was never risk averse. He saw what could be done and how to make money off of it. Apple is a Trillion dollar company as a result and Woz is a billionaire.
- wtracy 6y agoTo build on that: Jobs was absolutely someone who did everything "for the love of the game." It's just that the game that interested him was marketing and design, not engineering. I can't imagine Jobs as someone motivated put his head down and do busywork to collect a brass nameplate with a fancy title after twenty years.
- mcherm 6y ago> as a result and Woz is a billionaire No.[1] Woz gave away much of his stock in Apple, more than half of it before Apple even went public. [1] https://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-businessmen/steve-wozniak-net-worth/ https://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-businessmen/steve-...