> their code is non-proprietary, doesn't belong to someone else, already has a open-licence Then say "we can't share for legal reason", not "we're planning to"

> their code is non-proprietary, doesn't belong to someone else, already has a open-licence Then say "we can't share for legal reason", not "we're planning to". This is just a bs corporate answer. > is of good enough quality to be shared with the public. This is a petty excuse. There is plenty of open-source code utterly crappy/barely functional out there.