4 ms·
Regulators are looking for language that abuses an existing monopoly. Intent to create a monopoly is not evidence for the existence of one.
by nkingsy 6y ago
Regulators are looking for language that abuses an existing monopoly. Intent to create a monopoly is not evidence for the existence of one.
- d1zzy 6y agoNo but once regulators determine (based on other criteria) that it IS a monopoly, then all those internal messages that seemed to agree with that will be used as proof that the company "knew" about it so the fines will be much larger.