4 ms·
First off, I like the idea, but there are some noticeable flaws, many which have been brought up. One interesting one for me, which is more an oversight, is th
by jimminy 16y ago
First off, I like the idea, but there are some noticeable flaws, many which have been brought up.
One interesting one for me, which is more an oversight, is that anyone can make money off of the sale of a link. There is no way to validate that the person posting the link, is the owner of the content. So someone could sell links to a page on HN, Reddit, Techcrunch, etc. at no expense to them.
If this did occur, I think it would cause a quite negative view of Gumroad links, as being scammy. In which case, people would begin to avoid them, reducing their effectiveness as a possible sales medium. Without oversight, as to who is selling a link, this might end up smothering itself out.
- peteforde 16y agoWhile providing an authority model is often a great business, it's a fallacy to say that provenance is mandatory to be taken seriously. See: Twitter, eBay, 4chan, TechCrunch