3 ms·
MLB.tv is the only subscription service (that I'm aware of) that charges for the app as well. And they do it inconsistently. I paid I think $120-$130, somewhe
by MatthewPhillips 16y ago
MLB.tv is the only subscription service (that I'm aware of) that charges for the app as well. And they do it inconsistently.
I paid I think $120-$130, somewhere in that range, for MLB.tv, however I need to pay an additional $15 to get it on my Android phone and an additional $15 to get it on my iPad. However on Roku I pay no additional cost for the app, and on the web I pay no additional cost.
I bought the iPad app because I felt I would be more likely to use it, when laying in bed and such. On the phone I would probably only use it in rare situations and so it's just not worth it for me.
Is any one aware of another subscription that has this type of price model?
- nomad2986 16y agoThis is exactly my issue with the At Bat app. I already pay for MLB.tv which plays video in Flash and I have a flash capable Android phone. I don't understand why I should have to pay extra for the app just to watch video. However, last time I checked I was blocked from watching content on my phone.
- uptown 16y agoUnless I'm missing something, even with an MLB.tv subscription, the Android app doesn't provide that feature.