3 ms·
Funny, both the USA [1] and Australia [2] can compel its companies to hand over all private data if asked and regularly exploit the security systems of their ow
by zb1plus 6y ago
Funny, both the USA [1] and Australia [2] can compel its companies to hand over all private data if asked and regularly exploit the security systems of their own companies with little to no due process to obtain data on people. Nation-states interests are disjoint from those of its people. We need global unity, not petty tribalism if we are to make the world a better place for all. The internet can be a powerful tool for unity, but state actors and other narrow minded selfish actors are currently seeing the value of it and manipulating it to support their political objectives. We need to unite and quash this menace to free societies and global free economies. Recent measures by the current US regime stoop to China's level and usher an era of balkanization that will ultimately destroy the competitiveness of US companies and promote petty nationalism and racism.
[1] https://www.aclu.org/other/national-security-letters https://www.aclu.org/other/national-security-letters
[2] https://www.theregister.com/2018/08/14/oz_encryption_backdoor/ https://www.theregister.com/2018/08/14/oz_encryption_backdoo...
- robobro 6y agoWell said. I think we also need to limit how much data corporations (especially advertiser cartels) are permitted to collect on individuals.
- chub500 6y ago> Nation-states interests are disjoint from those of its people. This is literally the opposite of what is true in a democracy. Of the people, by the people and for the people. You can be cynical as hell, sure, but that will require significantly more justification and evidence to make such an incredibly broad assertion. To give a clear example: why does the US get data from Apple, Google? To catch criminals. Why does CCP do the same?
- beaunative 6y agoJust the last sentence: Why does the CCP get data from Apple or Microsoft? To catch criminals. I honestly don't see how this rhetoric is coherent or persuasive