>Can you formulate a "no endorsing violence" policy that keeps the current protests/riots while banning Trump's latest idiocy Yes, it’s quite simple and I’m wo

>Can you formulate a "no endorsing violence" policy that keeps the current protests/riots while banning Trump's latest idiocy Yes, it’s quite simple and I’m wondering if you are intentionally or accidentally being obtuse by trying to frame the current protests as riots. There were plenty of peaceful protests all over the country - no endorsing violence simply means not highlighting peaceful protests over violent ones. It’s not rocket science except to those grasp at straws in order to equate civilians walking in the streets to Trump implying police shoot civilians.