3 ms·
Because Facebook is not an ISP nor a FedEx. They do not provide a service that ships information. Now, you can muddy the semantics by saying, "Isn't every web
by three_seagrass 6y ago
Because Facebook is not an ISP nor a FedEx. They do not provide a service that ships information.
Now, you can muddy the semantics by saying, "Isn't every website an information shipper?" and even then the answer is still no, that still does not make them a common carrier.
There are what people want Facebook to be, which is some system supporting of their own political views, but the bad faith arguments to project Facebook into being an ISP are not sound.
- manigandham 6y agoWhy are the arguments not sound? Why is a private company maintaining communications between 2 billion people not possibly a common carrier?
- bleepblorp 6y agoWhether Facebook is an ISP or not isn't material to whether it should be a common carrier. Facebook's social function is as a distributor of broadcast information and carrier of peer-to-peer information for two billion people. Further, network effects mean that Facebook's size makes it a natural monopoly. There is no shortage of historical evidence that unregulated natural monopolies are bad news for everyone except their owners, and, given that Facebook's function is the distribution of information, the natural path for regulation in a free society is a common carrier designation.
- zo1 6y agoYou didn't answer the question from OP. "What makes Facebook different from FedEx that it should censor messages between willing participants?" Of course Facebook isn't a UPS or a mail carrier, etc, we know that.