3 ms·
Yes thank you for not fauning over Cargo like many other reviews. The simple fact is Cargo did not learn from prior art to the extent Rust did. Things have go
by Ericson2314 6y ago
Yes thank you for not fauning over Cargo like many other reviews.
The simple fact is Cargo did not learn from prior art to the extent Rust did.
Things have gotten better, but Rust is still better designed. Hopefully Cargo can someday catch up.
- kibwen 6y agoIf this is referring to namespacing, that's a crates.io concern, not a Cargo concern. Cargo is fully capable of using other registries, and there's nothing stopping those registries from using namespaces to organize and disambiguate crates.
- Ericson2314 6y agoI'm not referring to namespacing in particular, which indeed doesn't concern me so much for those reasons.
- avasthe 6y agoI would be curious to hear what are your criticisms of cargo, too. Recently I am trying to study about dependency management in different languages, and cargo, along with bundler seems to be praised quite a bit. I can't correlate it with quality because both rust and ruby camps are quite vocal.