2 ms·
I guess I can't disagree with your specific points about memory, but OS pages are already copy-on-write -- if you're really concerned about that kind of overhea
by haberman 16y ago
I guess I can't disagree with your specific points about memory, but OS pages are already copy-on-write -- if you're really concerned about that kind of overhead you could always fork() individual OS processes from one that already has everything loaded.
- ianb 16y agoRe: copy-on-write: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2407397 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2407397 -- tl;dr reference counting ruins copy-on-write