You say that it shouldn't exist but don't elaborate in the assumptions of why. There are some major unspoken assumptions to their illegitimacy. My best guess i

You say that it shouldn't exist but don't elaborate in the assumptions of why. There are some major unspoken assumptions to their illegitimacy. My best guess is the sheer tackiness of self-promotion involved? The control of corporate brands being antithetical and clashing to the "rawness" of talking about being hit on by old men before menarche and thus deeply phony and "uncool". Are the objections moral (it is wrong even if it works), functional (it just doesn't work), or both (it is wrong and doesn't even work)?