> Because if she can prove she's being oppressed, there are a large number of legal prescriptions But if it is the entire "system" that is oppressing her, then

> Because if she can prove she's being oppressed, there are a large number of legal prescriptions But if it is the entire "system" that is oppressing her, then she is likely to find that these legal prescriptions do not apply in her case. Isn't that quite obvious? If you're being oppressed by a system, the system oppresses you, no matter how loudly it claims that it has resolutions for anyone who is being oppressed. The fact that the system does not work for you is what it means to be oppressed in the first place.