> The question is the opposite: you have to prove to managers the benefit overcomes the risk of using a new language. Rust is still not nearly stable nor popula

> The question is the opposite: you have to prove to managers the benefit overcomes the risk of using a new language. Rust is still not nearly stable nor popular enough for many fields. I'm not sure what you're saying. Rust 1.0 code compiles just fine in the most recent rust compiler. It's been stable since that 1.0 point and promises to continue being stable. C++ doesn't have a a stable ABI either.