3 ms·
> In a statement Tuesday, PAL Airlines said the two men would be banned indefinitely from the airline's flights. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-la
by jdkfkror 6y ago
> In a statement Tuesday, PAL Airlines said the two men would be banned indefinitely from the airline's flights.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/racist-comments-pal-flight-1.5390513 https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/racist-...
- moritonal 6y agoBecause they insulted people on the same plane. In this metaphor that'd be like an ISP blocking a customer because they were hacking other customers, which is fine.
- jdkfkror 6y agoYou are making my point. If someone puts racist content on the net and a black customer complains, it's fine for the ISP to block them.
- Fjolsvith 6y agoYour example only works if the offensive content was sent unsolicited. If the person offended sought out the content I do not think the content should be banned (assuming the content was legal speech).
- ffpip 6y agoThat is different. ISP's have those kinds of power too. Try running a DDOS attack without the ISP blocking you. Or try accessing banned content, without workarounds. A good read on who should be held responsible, written by Cloudflare's CEO. https://blog.cloudflare.com/why-we-terminated-daily-stormer/ https://blog.cloudflare.com/why-we-terminated-daily-stormer/