4 ms·
>However, the caveat to that is that journalists are on Twitter, pay a lot of attention to Twitter, and report it as reality. Getting dogpiled on Twitter may no
by schemy 6y ago
>However, the caveat to that is that journalists are on Twitter, pay a lot of attention to Twitter, and report it as reality. Getting dogpiled on Twitter may not matter, but having it reported in newspapers may make it matter.
And how many people read newspapers?
The only thing that matters to a business is when people show up with placards in front of the business, or the CEOs house. The cases where that happens are so few and far between that by ignoring everything a newspaper writes you improve your business's performance by the simple fact you're not paying someone to waste time. The rest of it can be summed up as "don't get caught putting babies in blenders".
- marcus_holmes 6y agoWell, investors get jittery if there's a lot of noise. Deals have failed because of controversy started by Twitter dogpiles. And you really don't need to go as far as a baby-blender interaction to generate a Twitter storm. Just hint at anything that might be construed as limiting a journalist's right to publish wtf they feel like publishing ;)