Making sure android can offer all the expected features of a modern phone os without being sued to death isn't improving the consumer experience ? And the whole

Making sure android can offer all the expected features of a modern phone os without being sued to death isn't improving the consumer experience ? And the whole monopoly thing you said is ludicrous, having a business that is making a whole lot of cash is in no way the same thing as abusing a dominant position. I honestly can't even understand how you could confuse the two. That's like saying the red cross is abusing its dominant position since it earns so much donations that it can afford to send people pretty much everywhere while other orgs can't. (I am in no way implying a relation between google and the red cross, just the first exemple to pop in my mind)