> Maybe Microsoft's got a valid point about abuses of dominant positions by Google. I agree with you that they've made some clever moves, but Google owns no sp

> Maybe Microsoft's got a valid point about abuses of dominant positions by Google. I agree with you that they've made some clever moves, but Google owns no spectrum (and this was before Android, right?) and almost no patents. It's hard to argue that they are abusing their dominant position in those fields - people are scared of what they could do, but "potential monopolist" is not a strong basis for an antitrust case.