3 ms·
Not going to downvote, but Reliance is equally "imperialist" in terms of where and how it can express market dominance. Imperialism is a function of nation-sta
by rswail 6y ago
Not going to downvote, but Reliance is equally "imperialist" in terms of where and how it can express market dominance.
Imperialism is a function of nation-states, not corporations.
Most nations have "national champion" corporations that work with the nation's government to promote/influence other nations. US/Boeing, EU/Airbus, France/Bull, etc.
So calling Bezos/Zuckerberg "imperialist" while Pichai/Nadella are somehow not is ridiculous. These are CEOs of corporations. All corporations are "imperialist" in that they are attempting to gain "market" against their competitors and they will co-opt their associated nation-state to help that.
Corporations are amoral by definition.