One of the interesting caveats about extraditions treaties is that they generally only apply to things that the country doing the expediting consider to be crim

One of the interesting caveats about extraditions treaties is that they generally only apply to things that the country doing the expediting consider to be criminal. With that in mind, someone spends their life in country A and does a bunch of things country A considers illegal and involve country B. This isn't an obvious caveat and isn't discussed much, so I can understand where nothing here would surface it. Extradition treaties mean that things don't become de facto legal because an international border is involved. Though I understand if some might consider such treaties to be simple abuses of hegemonic imperialism.