3 ms·

I have (semi-)frequently gone “off-grid” far away from established trails, without carrying a PLB. Sometimes I’ve gone days without seeing another human. I have

I have (semi-)frequently gone “off-grid” far away from established trails, without carrying a PLB. Sometimes I’ve gone days without seeing another human. I have extensive training in wilderness navigation, and have always reviewed my itinerary with the rangers ahead of time. In hindsight, I can see how this was a selfish decision. This feeling has been nagging at me for a while, since I’ve had close calls in remote areas that would have jeopardized the inevitable SAR crews. So, I’ll acquire a PLB and carry it on future trips. Thank you for the reminder. That said, I think some of my hesitation in the past was rooted in this belief that PLBs were unreliable and mostly a nuisance due to the abuse by inexperienced hikers. Also, if you are in cell range (like on the majority of the AT), I believe that a phone is the superior device since you can communicate the severity of your emergency to emergency services and they can respond accordingly. I’d like to read more about this if you have some links: > ”now rescue organizations all over the planet are asking you to please...carry a goddamn PLB”

ohazi 6y ago
> I believe that a phone is the superior device since you can communicate the severity of your emergency to emergency services and they can respond accordingly. Agreed -- if you're able to get cell reception, and the emergency is not life-or-death time critical, you should try using the phone first. > I’d like to read more about this if you have some links: > > ”now rescue organizations all over the planet are asking you to please...carry a goddamn PLB” Basically, the search part is really really expensive and time consuming for rescue organizations. You need a lot of man power and a lot of fuel, and the search can go on for days, and you may not even be sure that the person is in the area where you're looking. If you can eliminate that part, all that's left is a direct flight to the location. It can be done quickly and relatively inexpensively, and is an easy win for both the rescue organization and the parent government (deaths and called-off rescue operations can be politically expensive).

ohazi 6y ago

> I believe that a phone is the superior device since you can communicate the severity of your emergency to emergency services and they can respond accordingly. Agreed -- if you're able to get cell reception, and the emergency is not life-or-death time critical, you should try using the phone first. > I’d like to read more about this if you have some links: > > ”now rescue organizations all over the planet are asking you to please...carry a goddamn PLB” Basically, the search part is really really expensive and time consuming for rescue organizations. You need a lot of man power and a lot of fuel, and the search can go on for days, and you may not even be sure that the person is in the area where you're looking. If you can eliminate that part, all that's left is a direct flight to the location. It can be done quickly and relatively inexpensively, and is an easy win for both the rescue organization and the parent government (deaths and called-off rescue operations can be politically expensive).