3 ms·
DO NOT BE MISTAKEN This is the same Pons & Fleischmann Cold Fusion effect. I will not argue semantics but Pons & Fleischmann, and Andrea Rossi are also due cred
by badinsie 6y ago
DO NOT BE MISTAKEN This is the same Pons & Fleischmann Cold Fusion effect. I will not argue semantics but Pons & Fleischmann, and Andrea Rossi are also due credit for researching this phenomenon. it makes sense if you think about it... imagine a 3D metal lattice...only say 8 atoms... you tightly pack as much Hydrogen as possible in the middle of the lattice.... everything is under immense heat and pressure.... spinning like crazy.... you hit it with a jolt. or a hammer.... and everything sorta smashes into each other and explodes. or maybe this is the 'inverse beta decay' / controlled electron capture method.
- fernly 6y agoIt is certainly reminiscent of P&F, in loading a metal matrix with deuterium. And the effect this paper documents could ... conceivably ... possibly ... maybe explain the erratic and fugitive positive results that P&F-style experimenters sometimes produced. But I don't think your certainty is well-founded yet.
- NiceWayToDoIT 6y agoSpot on. Funny enough speaking about semantic, remind me on Star Trek dilithium crystals...