The argument being made is that Go's design isn't so much "forward thinking" as it is driven by Google's interests. What they are not stating is that Go is a c

The argument being made is that Go's design isn't so much "forward thinking" as it is driven by Google's interests. What they are not stating is that Go is a conservative language with a standard library hampered by that conservatism, nor are they making a judgment on the current state of the language. If you are going to criticize someone's post, give them the respect of actually reading their argument, and not just writing a knee-jerk reaction.