> several others are clearly just riffing off the headline I don't blame them, the language is not pleasant to read, the ideas superficial and a cursory glance

> several others are clearly just riffing off the headline I don't blame them, the language is not pleasant to read, the ideas superficial and a cursory glance is enough to give a general idea of the content. That said, the article was still surprisingly coherent for being auto-generated. I wonder how much was edited to make it so. If no or minimal editing was applied then this is darn impressive, and we just might indeed start seeing more texts like this. Or miss them, as it were.