4 ms·
The Falcon Heavy uses 27 engines and has a perfect track record ,so they've got some credibility here.
by nkoren 6y ago
The Falcon Heavy uses 27 engines and has a perfect track record ,so they've got some credibility here.
- shdh 6y agoJust to add clarification, Falcon Heavy uses the Merlin engine, not the Raptor engine.
- jcun4128 6y agoYeah looks like 3 for 3 so far. It seems like a big number... as opposed to just 5 (Saturn V). What is the rationale for more smaller engines(other than offset/greater forces/new R&D)?
- NikolaeVarius 6y agoLosing one means less affect on the overall mission
- koalala 6y agoi suppose 2 could blow up, no problem :)
- SEJeff 6y agoWhy only turn it up to 11 when you can turn it up to 31? See the Starship dial goes all the way to 31.
- HPsquared 6y agoThings have different scaling laws. Very large rocket engines might not be practical for a range of reasons: wall thickness required to contain the high pressures (this is probably a big one) combined with the temperatures, combustion instability, controllability, and general ability to manufacture. Why are elephants and ants differently shaped? Another example is piston engines: large ones generally have lots of (relatively small compared to the overall displacement) cylinders rather than a couple of massive ones. If a small number of rocket engines was required they would probably have a completely different design, perhaps an aerospike. Or maybe resurrecting Project Orion?
- jcun4128 6y agoI never quite got the Orion(nuclear?) engine design eg. is it literal "nuclear explosions" or just using nuclear as a heat source. I think they push fluid through the bells, maybe other materials(like ceramic) for the larger nozzles... can they use magnetic field to contain heat... probably not assumes it's ionized or something ha... heat still goes through magnetism. I got it, active heat destructive interface ha.
- garmaine 6y agoLiteral nuclear explosions, Every few seconds, with a giant spring to even out the force.
- maccam94 6y agoNuclear thermal rockets are much more interesting IMO because they were actually viable and in development until Nixon killed them for no good reason. They're coming back now though. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NERVA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NERVA https://spacenews.com/momentum-grows-for-nuclear-thermal-propulsion/ https://spacenews.com/momentum-grows-for-nuclear-thermal-pro... (2019)
- SEJeff 6y agoI take it you've literally never seen this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOO5S4vxi0o https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOO5S4vxi0o The joke went entirely over your head boss.