3 ms·
These both look like reasonable thoughts. Person 1 either sincerely believes it was written by GPT-3, or they are simply using the comparison as a sarcastic rem
by happytoexplain 6y ago
These both look like reasonable thoughts. Person 1 either sincerely believes it was written by GPT-3, or they are simply using the comparison as a sarcastic remark (they should have made it more clear). Person 2 reasonably took the latter meaning.
Edit: I should say mostly reasonable. Person 2 ended with uncalled-for snark, and as I said, person 1 potentially was being unnecessarily sarcastic. But I don't think this interaction is a good example of "bullshit".
- deeg 6y agoIt brings up an interesting HN moderation problem: can someone bash a post/article by implying that it was written by GPT-3? The community then has to determine if the comment is snark or a reasonable conclusion.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]