That's a fair point. I added this footnote to the piece in the same spirit: > The report helped popularize the term “Von Neumann architecture” as a way to deno

That's a fair point. I added this footnote to the piece in the same spirit: > The report helped popularize the term “Von Neumann architecture” as a way to denote computers that store programs in memory. The term and the original paper are both controversial because they both fail to acknowledge Von Neumann’s peers and predecessors. Although this seems to be an accident of history, the influence of Von Neumann’s first draft is undeniable. Sound good?