3 ms·
The original trade-off was having a non-sucky web email client. GMail, the first real "client-side" app, was so far beyond Hotmail / Yahoo Mail in usability th
by tomp 6y ago
The original trade-off was having a non-sucky web email client.
GMail, the first real "client-side" app, was so far beyond Hotmail / Yahoo Mail in usability that it's hard to even phantom ever going back.
- astura 6y agoI don't know where this misconception came from - XMLHttpRequest was invented by Microsoft for use in Outlook Web Access, Gmail was essentially a copy of that.
- tomp 6y agoAh, maybe. I didn't use OWA back then... And even now it's pretty shit (compared to GMail), so ...
- arexxbifs 6y agoThe first web versions of Outlook were plenty fast and usable on my then workstation (PIII 667 MHz w/ 256 meg). In fact, a lot of the web applications made 15 years ago were fast enough for comfortable use on Pentium 4 and G4 CPUs, because most used combinations of server-side rendering and vanilla JS. It was painful to develop, sure, but the tradeoff in place now is severely detrimental to end users.
- tilolebo 6y agoTrue! I remember using OWA in my university around 2003, before the first invites for Gmail went out. You could switch to the horrendous non-Ajax interface. I never realized that before, always thought Gmail was the first Ajax webapp.