4 ms·
is there any benefit in using the phone network for 2FA besides (IMHO too) easy recovery in case of loss? Is there an equivalently usable method for recovery? r
by mercora 6y ago
is there any benefit in using the phone network for 2FA besides (IMHO too) easy recovery in case of loss? Is there an equivalently usable method for recovery? recovery codes aren't practicall i guess because people would keep loosing them too.
Maybe some pseudonymous proof using cryptographic functions of modern passports could be used somehow without revealing real identity to the passport issuer too? It should not be possible to know who issued the pseudonymous identity proof but should also only be proof-able by me...
- gruez 6y agoYou can outsource it to something like authy, which is still sms based, but gets disabled if you install their app. They also claim that they can detect number porting attacks, so that might be marginally better. >Maybe some pseudonymous proof using cryptographic functions of modern passports could be used somehow without revealing real identity to the passport issuer too? You can still lose your passport. It's less likely than losing your phone, but still. Also, to access the cryptographic functions of a passport, you probably need a NFC reader, which isn't exactly accessible.
- mercora 6y ago>You can still lose your passport. It's less likely than losing your phone, but still. Also, to access the cryptographic functions of a passport, you probably need a NFC reader, which isn't exactly accessible. i thought maybe the pseudonymous identity proof could still work after your passport has been reissued either because of loss or because of invalidation. But its probably not really doable with named constraints. Modern phones are apparently often equipped with an NFC reader. I think this could be usable enough for the recovery case.