2 ms·
I think unambiguous parsing drives the chosen syntax more than pleasing aesthetics.
by secondcoming 6y ago
I think unambiguous parsing drives the chosen syntax more than pleasing aesthetics.
- firethief 6y agoOther languages manage to be parsable without the syntactic aesthic getting Lovecraftian. I think the other factor in C++ is the how much has been added to the language while maintaining backward-compatibility.