Nobody is "blinded because the math is right". You're using the same sort of argumentation that is used in all of the pseudo sciences. If you know of a way to

Nobody is "blinded because the math is right". You're using the same sort of argumentation that is used in all of the pseudo sciences. If you know of a way to improve upon the existing methodologies, then show it to us, and be precise. Then you will have an argument that deserves to be engaged with. Ambiguous claims that the math "doesn't actually reflect anything real" sound intelligent, but really aren't saying much at all.