4 ms·
Perhaps, but in physics the maths and experiments run very close. In fields like economics it's easier to make a grandiose and "falsifiable" piece of math that
by ramblerman 6y ago
Perhaps, but in physics the maths and experiments run very close.
In fields like economics it's easier to make a grandiose and "falsifiable" piece of math that is absolutely correct but doesn't actually reflect anything real.
Or more often reflects a tiny part of a first order effect.
Yet people get blinded because the math is right.
- SantalBlush 6y agoNobody is "blinded because the math is right". You're using the same sort of argumentation that is used in all of the pseudo sciences. If you know of a way to improve upon the existing methodologies, then show it to us, and be precise. Then you will have an argument that deserves to be engaged with. Ambiguous claims that the math "doesn't actually reflect anything real" sound intelligent, but really aren't saying much at all.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]