5 ms·

Ask HN: How to effectively generate big data reports?

• jerf 16y ago
  What's wrong with Cacti? I ask this not as a veiled suggestion to "just use Cacti", but as a serious question, to figure out what it is you are trying to do and specifically why that's not good enough.
  • Skywing 16y ago
    We did setup Cacti but we were wanting to focus on tracking data particularly about the CPU of each server, as well as 1 particular process running on it. For that process, we wanted to track various stats like thread count, open network connections by it, open files by it, etc. We also wanted to monitor some environment metrics. The system we wrote is simply a Python app running under a cron job, reporting this data to our database server(s). We're going to be adding some notification type functionality to it so that we will be notified if things go awry, which they tend to do at least once a week. :( I'm pleased with out data collecting setup - it's working well. But, obviously the power is in the reporting which is what we will be working on this upcoming week. I'm just researching the best methods for doing this in a scalable manner.
    • jerf 16y ago
      It's still somewhat unclear to me how Cacti is deficient. You know it can track anything, right, not just what it ships with out of the box? I have a chat-like server process that holds open TCP streams to clients indefinitely, and we wrote something to feed Cacti that number, and it tracks it like any other. I don't know how the internals look so I don't know whether it ends up being useful for other uses or not. The other thing you probably ought to specify is the frequency of the reports and what you want them to be reporting on. On a decently-spec'ed system it just doesn't seem like you're really talking about that much data here, you should probably try to be more clear where your bottleneck is. And you should probably head to some community that can pay attention to something like this for a longer period of time, a forum or a newsgroup or something.
• latch 16y ago
  Have you tried doing this in real time yet, or near real time with maybe a short lived cache? I mean, 100 points doesn't seem like much. If you just want the last load measurement for 100 servers, seems like a pretty lightweight mapreduce with an inline/streamed return value. You could cache the results in your app server for ~10seconds and have the front-end refresh every 10 seconds (giving you max-stale data of 20 seconds). Beyond that, for your scaling question, I am a fan of generating reportable data asynchronously and keeping the UI stuff as a very simple select/find (which seems to be where you want to start). Each report would be its own transform - some of which might be more real-time than others. If your data is really huge and a single report is limited by MongoDB's single-threaded map-reduce, you'll need to look at the Mongo-Hadoop bridge. Another solution is to simply store your data into a reportable format upfront. Of course, if you need to look at your data 50 different ways, it now turns into 50 inserts instead of just 1. I think I'd try in real time, especially just for your initial cpu load, then move to an asynchronous transformation..and when that no longer meets your needs, deal with it then...I think it'll be a while before you get there. You might be well served by asking this in the [active] MongoDB user group: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/mongodb-user https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/mongodb-user
  • Skywing 16y ago
    When you suggest trying it in real time, initially, are you saying to just go ahead and generate a new report every time the page is requested? I might as well go ahead and try this, knowing that it's not going to be under heavy user load. That might give me a good cpu load benchmark, as you said.
    • latch 16y ago
      yes, though like I said, there's no reason you can cache the results for a short time (whatever works for you..I've seen as short as 5 seconds and as long as 5 hours). That way, if 10 users happen to look at it at the same time (common if you have an auto-refresh ajax thing going), it will keep the load low.
• asharp 16y ago
  Make sure you generate everything you need when processing data in one pass. ie. you take the last 100 data points, (or what have you), turn that into your graph. Then work on the next set of points, etc. The key to this is to make sure that everything is constant sized. Don't have anything that has to run over every data point you collect. As an example, you can take the last 5 minutes worth of data points (as a buffer), and then create a single five minute graph. You can then create an average of the 5 minutes worth of points and move that in to a second buffer which would have say an hours worth of points in 5 minute intervals, etc. Each step has a constant sized buffer and will draw in constant time. Also, when you view your report, only view pregenerated graphs/tables/etc. It just makes things easier on you, and it stops you from having to care particularly about how long it takes to run your analysis.
  • prodigal_erik 16y ago
    It's worth noting that a sliding window of summarized monitoring samples is a solved problem: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RRDtool http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RRDtool
• ZackOfAllTrades 16y ago
  One way to do it: every XXX minutes generate a file containing all the data pulled from MongoDB for the past YYY minutes. Have that sit someplace accessible within the Intranet. Use some XMLHttpRequest on the browser side to pull the data up. Load it up and parse it into arrays and then throw it into a dataTable[0] or some custom Raphael.js [1] stuff. Reload every XXX minutes. It seems like that if you just generate data on the server side and then do all the processing on the client side, you can keep the load light on the server and still do neat stuff with your data. [0]http://www.datatables.net/ http://www.datatables.net/ [1]http://raphaeljs.com/ http://raphaeljs.com/