8 ms·

It should be harder for you to post this on HN.

by Udo 16y ago

pacohn 16y ago
Why? Am I missing something?
- Udo 16y ago
  I believe this is not relevant to most hackers, except if they happen to be bio researchers. Worse yet, while being mostly irrelevant, it's also a barely disguised flamebait piece designed to incite a fruitless ethics debate. This should be posted somewhere else. And I don't care how many downvotes I get either; the guys who where complaining about the increasing lack of focus on HN earlier today were right.
  - chc 16y ago
    They were also complaining about lack of civility, which is the reason your comment (which has a very snide tone) is getting downvoted.
    - Udo 16y ago
      I know why I'm being downvoted, it's always a risk when posting a comment with a certain tone. Though I don't normally post in this style, I just didn't care when I wrote it. I realize this thread may have prompted an inordinate amount of frustration in me which should probably have been directed towards worthier targets.
  - devinj 16y ago
    Really? I thought it was thought-provoking, even if I'm not entirely sure that I agree with the author. Certainly more intellectually stimulating than the usual "Company X did Thing Y" items. But then, I've never really been clear on the topic of HN. Seems to me it's "stuff interesting to hackers", which this may well be, even if it isn't interesting to one individual hacker.
  - pacohn 16y ago
    Thanks for the answer. Personally, I don't see it so much as flamebait as an interesting issue. Even so, as long as people remain civil, I think discussions of conflicting viewpoints can be very valuable. I had the impression that HN was for broad content, as long as it was intellectually stimulating. However, based on this recent post about the decline of HN: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2403696 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2403696 I get the feeling that there are conflicting communities here. Perhaps you are right. This is my second post. I am feeling conflicted, actually.
    - Udo 16y ago
      I'm obviously mistaken, otherwise the thread wouldn't have received so many positive votes. In fact, I apologize, it's me who apparently lost the plot. I bow to the majority opinion. > I get the feeling that there are conflicting communities here. Maybe, though that matter seems to be resolving itself on its own currently. > Personally, I don't see it so much as flamebait as an interesting issue Science research should be held to a higher standard, it shouldn't be compared to household rat catching. This shouldn't be thought-provoking at all. It's a case of apples and oranges. It's also borderline politics.
      - pacohn 16y ago
        >> I get the feeling that there are conflicting communities here. >Maybe, though that matter seems to be resolving itself on its own currently. Well I think HN grew due to the hacker community. After reading some in the post I linked. I am thinking that it might not be right that it be hijacked. I was a big Redditor and felt driven away somewhat recently. I guess this is all tangential, but no offense taken. Best.
    - YuriNiyazov 16y ago
      Reading this article made me think "wow, not everything is lost, this is exactly the kind of stuff that HN used to have on it before the decline", so I definitely disagree with Udo
      - 16y ago
  - spoondan 16y ago
    The standard for an article's appropriateness is whether it's something "that good hackers would find interesting", not whether it's "relevant to most hackers."
    - deleted 16y ago
      [deleted]

It should be harder for you to post this on HN.

by Udo 16y ago

It should be harder for you to post this on HN.

pacohn 16y ago

Why? Am I missing something?

Udo 16y ago
I believe this is not relevant to most hackers, except if they happen to be bio researchers. Worse yet, while being mostly irrelevant, it's also a barely disguised flamebait piece designed to incite a fruitless ethics debate. This should be posted somewhere else. And I don't care how many downvotes I get either; the guys who where complaining about the increasing lack of focus on HN earlier today were right.
- chc 16y ago
  They were also complaining about lack of civility, which is the reason your comment (which has a very snide tone) is getting downvoted.
  - Udo 16y ago
    I know why I'm being downvoted, it's always a risk when posting a comment with a certain tone. Though I don't normally post in this style, I just didn't care when I wrote it. I realize this thread may have prompted an inordinate amount of frustration in me which should probably have been directed towards worthier targets.
- devinj 16y ago
  Really? I thought it was thought-provoking, even if I'm not entirely sure that I agree with the author. Certainly more intellectually stimulating than the usual "Company X did Thing Y" items. But then, I've never really been clear on the topic of HN. Seems to me it's "stuff interesting to hackers", which this may well be, even if it isn't interesting to one individual hacker.
- pacohn 16y ago
  Thanks for the answer. Personally, I don't see it so much as flamebait as an interesting issue. Even so, as long as people remain civil, I think discussions of conflicting viewpoints can be very valuable. I had the impression that HN was for broad content, as long as it was intellectually stimulating. However, based on this recent post about the decline of HN: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2403696 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2403696 I get the feeling that there are conflicting communities here. Perhaps you are right. This is my second post. I am feeling conflicted, actually.
  - Udo 16y ago
    I'm obviously mistaken, otherwise the thread wouldn't have received so many positive votes. In fact, I apologize, it's me who apparently lost the plot. I bow to the majority opinion. > I get the feeling that there are conflicting communities here. Maybe, though that matter seems to be resolving itself on its own currently. > Personally, I don't see it so much as flamebait as an interesting issue Science research should be held to a higher standard, it shouldn't be compared to household rat catching. This shouldn't be thought-provoking at all. It's a case of apples and oranges. It's also borderline politics.
    - pacohn 16y ago
      >> I get the feeling that there are conflicting communities here. >Maybe, though that matter seems to be resolving itself on its own currently. Well I think HN grew due to the hacker community. After reading some in the post I linked. I am thinking that it might not be right that it be hijacked. I was a big Redditor and felt driven away somewhat recently. I guess this is all tangential, but no offense taken. Best.
  - YuriNiyazov 16y ago
    Reading this article made me think "wow, not everything is lost, this is exactly the kind of stuff that HN used to have on it before the decline", so I definitely disagree with Udo
    - 16y ago
- spoondan 16y ago
  The standard for an article's appropriateness is whether it's something "that good hackers would find interesting", not whether it's "relevant to most hackers."
  - deleted 16y ago
    [deleted]