4 ms·
> Qt is the best I've seen, but it has the normal c++ FUD Not sure what you mean exactly; C++ is complex, but why the fear and doubt? Also - Qt is based on ve
by einpoklum 6y ago
> Qt is the best I've seen, but it has the normal c++ FUD
Not sure what you mean exactly; C++ is complex, but why the fear and doubt?
Also - Qt is based on veeery old C++ - a 22-year-old standard. The language has changed significantly since then, while Qt's fundamental design (in terms of programming) - not really, or not much. So, Qt is not "normal C++" these days.
- bmn__ 6y agoSimply add https://github.com/woboq/verdigris https://github.com/woboq/verdigris so you can use C++ ≥ 14.
- slavik81 6y agoThe moc is not the issue. The biggest design problem with Qt is that it predates move semantics. That history affects the design of almost every class. It feels like a beautiful old walking path that detours around a wall that's long since been torn out. It's still fine... but... it's not how you'd design it if you were to start from scratch.