4 ms·

Images of US Military Space Drone

53 points by jaynate 16y ago

mikepink 16y ago
The captions only show up when you hover over the images :/
- reemrevnivek 16y ago
  Thanks for the tip! It's unlikely that I would have discovered the captions without this comment...
Andrenid 16y ago
I got excited by the title, as I misunderstood it to mean that we would actually see the images the drone took (the photos of the drone are still interesting though).
jaynate 16y ago
Sorry about that, edited the title. Neat toy, though.
georgieporgie 16y ago
You can really see how tiny that thing is in the last two photos. I've never seen a photo of the Space Shuttle next to anything I can relate to, so I was amazed how enormous it was on a visit to the Houston Space Center. The only relevant photo I can find puts it atop a 747: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Atlantis_on_Shuttle_Carrier_Aircraft.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Atlantis_on_Shuttle_Carrie...
- jswanson 16y ago
  NASA has a lot of really good pictures up on their site actually. Here's a front on shot of Discovery. It has some people in it, which are great for scale: http://mediaarchive.ksc.nasa.gov/imageviewer.cfm?mediaid=51090&mr=l&w=0&h=0&fn=2011-2172&sn=KSC-2011-2172 http://mediaarchive.ksc.nasa.gov/imageviewer.cfm?mediaid=510...
- gaius 16y ago
  It's curious how shuttle-like it looks; without a crew to accomodate it could be literally any shape you wanted, subject to aerodynamic considerations. Reusing the design or scaled prototype for a next generation manned craft?
  - geedee77 16y ago
    I can't remember where I read it (it may have been Wikipedia) but the shape X-37 was based on the shuttle which is why it's the current craft that's being developed by the military. There was another craft prototyped but it was too costly and time consuming to test out a completely new shape.
jonursenbach 16y ago
Really curious as to what their mission was/is.
- jarin 16y ago
  Ostensibly it's a versatile spy drone, but kind of makes you wonder when you see the guys in hazmat suits. Edit: It makes sense if the drone uses hydrazine or other toxic propellants though.
  - alexbell 16y ago
    Yes, it's nothing out of the ordinary. After the shuttle lands personnel in similar suits can be seen with similar sensor wands going over the shuttle.
c1sc0 16y ago
"In the early hours of Dec. 3, 2010, the X-37B became the first U.S. space vehicle to make an autonomous runway landing from orbit." I find this snippet far more interesting than the speculation about what the mission was about. Maybe I don't even want to know what it was doing, but it's good to see that the military is still pushing technology development. Also see: autonomous drones.
- pedrocr 16y ago
  The soviet shuttle imitation did this in its only flight back in 1988: The automated landing took place on a runway at Baikonur Cosmodrome where, despite a lateral wind speed of 61.2 kilometres per hour (38.0 mph), it landed only 3 metres (9.8 ft) laterally and 10 metres (33 ft) longitudinally from the target mark.[4] The unmanned flight was the first time that a spacecraft of this size and complexity had been launched, completed maneuvers in orbit, re-entered the atmosphere, and landed under automatic guidance. If the figures are true and not just Soviet propaganda, that's one amazing automated landing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buran_(spacecraft)#Flight_into_space http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buran_(spacecraft)#Flight_into_...
ck2 16y ago
So while the shuttle program was canceled with hundreds of flights left on their frame lifetimes, the military gets practically unlimited funding for their toys and wargames.
- astrodust 16y ago
  The shuttle was always a huge waste of money. Reusable vehicles can't compete with simpler single-use type vehicles. The Russians built their own reusable shuttle, then scrapped it early on. It's hard to compete with the Soyuz because it's simple and it works.
- blasdel 16y ago
  The shuttle was only ever built because of massive military funding for toys and wargames: http://idlewords.com/2005/08/a_rocket_to_nowhere.htm http://idlewords.com/2005/08/a_rocket_to_nowhere.htm
hopeless 16y ago
The Register has had some really good coverage of this plane over the past year: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/04/21/x37b_secret_launch_options/ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/04/21/x37b_secret_launch_o... http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/02/04/x37b_ski/ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/02/04/x37b_ski/ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03/07/2nd_x37b_in_orbit/ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03/07/2nd_x37b_in_orbit/

53 points by jaynate 16y ago

mikepink 16y ago

The captions only show up when you hover over the images :/

reemrevnivek 16y ago
Thanks for the tip! It's unlikely that I would have discovered the captions without this comment...

Andrenid 16y ago

I got excited by the title, as I misunderstood it to mean that we would actually see the images the drone took (the photos of the drone are still interesting though).

jaynate 16y ago

Sorry about that, edited the title. Neat toy, though.

georgieporgie 16y ago

You can really see how tiny that thing is in the last two photos. I've never seen a photo of the Space Shuttle next to anything I can relate to, so I was amazed how enormous it was on a visit to the Houston Space Center. The only relevant photo I can find puts it atop a 747: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Atlantis_on_Shuttle_Carrier_Aircraft.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Atlantis_on_Shuttle_Carrie...

jswanson 16y ago
NASA has a lot of really good pictures up on their site actually. Here's a front on shot of Discovery. It has some people in it, which are great for scale: http://mediaarchive.ksc.nasa.gov/imageviewer.cfm?mediaid=51090&mr=l&w=0&h=0&fn=2011-2172&sn=KSC-2011-2172 http://mediaarchive.ksc.nasa.gov/imageviewer.cfm?mediaid=510...
gaius 16y ago
It's curious how shuttle-like it looks; without a crew to accomodate it could be literally any shape you wanted, subject to aerodynamic considerations. Reusing the design or scaled prototype for a next generation manned craft?
- geedee77 16y ago
  I can't remember where I read it (it may have been Wikipedia) but the shape X-37 was based on the shuttle which is why it's the current craft that's being developed by the military. There was another craft prototyped but it was too costly and time consuming to test out a completely new shape.

jonursenbach 16y ago

Really curious as to what their mission was/is.

jarin 16y ago
Ostensibly it's a versatile spy drone, but kind of makes you wonder when you see the guys in hazmat suits. Edit: It makes sense if the drone uses hydrazine or other toxic propellants though.
- alexbell 16y ago
  Yes, it's nothing out of the ordinary. After the shuttle lands personnel in similar suits can be seen with similar sensor wands going over the shuttle.

c1sc0 16y ago

"In the early hours of Dec. 3, 2010, the X-37B became the first U.S. space vehicle to make an autonomous runway landing from orbit." I find this snippet far more interesting than the speculation about what the mission was about. Maybe I don't even want to know what it was doing, but it's good to see that the military is still pushing technology development. Also see: autonomous drones.

pedrocr 16y ago
The soviet shuttle imitation did this in its only flight back in 1988: The automated landing took place on a runway at Baikonur Cosmodrome where, despite a lateral wind speed of 61.2 kilometres per hour (38.0 mph), it landed only 3 metres (9.8 ft) laterally and 10 metres (33 ft) longitudinally from the target mark.[4] The unmanned flight was the first time that a spacecraft of this size and complexity had been launched, completed maneuvers in orbit, re-entered the atmosphere, and landed under automatic guidance. If the figures are true and not just Soviet propaganda, that's one amazing automated landing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buran_(spacecraft)#Flight_into_space http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buran_(spacecraft)#Flight_into_...

ck2 16y ago

So while the shuttle program was canceled with hundreds of flights left on their frame lifetimes, the military gets practically unlimited funding for their toys and wargames.

astrodust 16y ago
The shuttle was always a huge waste of money. Reusable vehicles can't compete with simpler single-use type vehicles. The Russians built their own reusable shuttle, then scrapped it early on. It's hard to compete with the Soyuz because it's simple and it works.
blasdel 16y ago
The shuttle was only ever built because of massive military funding for toys and wargames: http://idlewords.com/2005/08/a_rocket_to_nowhere.htm http://idlewords.com/2005/08/a_rocket_to_nowhere.htm

hopeless 16y ago

The Register has had some really good coverage of this plane over the past year: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/04/21/x37b_secret_launch_options/ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/04/21/x37b_secret_launch_o... http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/02/04/x37b_ski/ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/02/04/x37b_ski/ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03/07/2nd_x37b_in_orbit/ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03/07/2nd_x37b_in_orbit/