> This makes absolutely no sense. If it is a matter of fact, it should be independently provable not require courts to decide. It makes plenty of sense once yo

> This makes absolutely no sense. If it is a matter of fact, it should be independently provable not require courts to decide. It makes plenty of sense once you realize that it's a fact that if a court decides something is illegal, the government may use its monopoly of force to enforce it. Don't confuse scientific fact with legal fact. Also don't confuse legal fact with a court's opinion as to whether the law was actually violated.