31 ms·
Wearing pants would be higher than 70% without government mandate -- does that mean that a law that you must have your junk covered an impingement on individual
by ponker 6y ago
Wearing pants would be higher than 70% without government mandate -- does that mean that a law that you must have your junk covered an impingement on individual rights?
- tomjen3 6y agoOf course. So is having to wear a mask. A mask is justified in the short term, the fact that you don't want to see my junk rates no higher than me not wanting to see your sportsball t-shirt. Unfortunately one of them is illegal and it isn't the sportsball t-shirt.