3 ms·
One thing that is not mentioned is that voice is horrible for internationalization. One issue with voice is that the language of the UI is far more deeply entan
by zokier 6y ago
One thing that is not mentioned is that voice is horrible for internationalization. One issue with voice is that the language of the UI is far more deeply entangled with the language of the content.
- fiblye 6y agoAnd it's definitely not future-proofed. Languages can change a lot in decades, from pronunciation to vocabulary to grammar. People think it's crazy that we still have people editing 50 year old COBOL programs today. Imagine how annoying it'd be to have to use a 50 year old computer that hasn't had "accent updates" and needing to emulate the speech patterns of your grandparents to be recognized.
- 082349872349872 6y agoOr spatially-proofed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqAu-DDlINs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqAu-DDlINs "Please? Pathetic." (Autocorrected SMS was unpopular in my country when it was first introduced, because it corrected to german german spellings, and ever since the mid-twentieth, we've been proud of regional orthographies. I imagine francophones who use "SMS language" also have to turn off autocorrect.)