3 ms·
This is specifically why I choose to support sources that don't have paywalls, but are still trustworthy news sources like Vox, The Guardian, etc. In these part
by SamWhited 6y ago
This is specifically why I choose to support sources that don't have paywalls, but are still trustworthy news sources like Vox, The Guardian, etc. In these particular cases they do have an editorial stance that I happen to agree with but others may not, but the facts are still there and they're largely trustworthy. They're also open about their editorial stance and biases, so if you don't agree you can still get the facts and be skeptical about the editorial stance. But either way, personally I like both these examples so I try to support them instead of organizations that put up a paywall. I'm sure if your worldview is different you can find organizations that are legit but also have different funding models to support, or just learn to separate facts from editorializing or op-eds.
- starik36 6y agoI don’t read the Guardian, but Vox has a significant bias. I wouldn’t call them trustworthy.
- SamWhited 6y agoLike I said, the facts are there. They're great journalists, and they're up front with their editorial stance. You don't have to agree with it, but you can still get the facts and good reporting.