Thank you, I've mailed author, he updated the post > UPDATE 2020-08-03: I no longer stand by the content in this post. I think the overall sentiment is margina

Thank you, I've mailed author, he updated the post > UPDATE 2020-08-03: I no longer stand by the content in this post. I think the overall sentiment is marginally accurate; however, the details in the post are incorrect (as many have pointed out over the years). > As has been pointed out, remove-if-not’s start/count parameters behave differently and cannot easily be separated out of the function, a design trade-off that I appreciate.